Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: Create Protection (Salting)—This page should be salted (and probably available only for creation from extended confirmed protection or onwards) as it is a demonstration page. The page also has a multi-deletion history. AravPerfectlyEdits (talk) 06:59, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of vandalism and tarnishing of information by some users in the name of editing. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 07:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – The subject is a Saudi Arabian dissident, and critic. IP users continue to introduce violations of the WP:BLP, especially as it pertains to sourcing, gossip, and BLP balance. IP users keep adding mentions of the subject engaging in sex work, and yellow journalism level gossip regarding subjects relationships and personal life, which is completely inappropriate for a BLP Wikipedia article of a person largely notable for a single event. In my personal opinion, these are attempts to further victimise the subject by smearing them in highly search ranked Wikipedia pages. Please consider protecting the page. Pinging admins who previously protected this page: Ohnoitsjamie, Deepfriedokra. Melmann 10:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jolielover♥talk 11:12, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive changes of file by various (potentially linked) accounts to use a copyvio image and removing presently used file. Trailblazer101 (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 12:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is a highly contentious ongoing conflict. Unregistered users have gotten their attention on it, which is becoming a problem. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Subject has been reported dead by several self published sources, however, no RS is reporting it yet. Have had many well-meaning but BLP-inexperienced editors trying to update the article with death info from these sources; request increase to EC protection. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wiki-fan-editor-68568 (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism Vellutis (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    No protection: No longer necessary. 1250metersdeep (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Why is it no longer necessary? Please expand your rationale. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: This page is protected just because some other article with Loco in its title that is completely unrelated to the song keeps getting recreated. I would like to request the protection for this page to be lifted so that it would be possible for me to create an article on the Netón Vega song "Loco". I opened an edit request for this page two weeks ago but it was disregarded. MC-123 (talk) 03:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @MC-123: There's no protection on this page so far as I can see. Is it possible you're getting blocked by the title blacklist? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I have created Draft:Loco (Netón Vega song) over the blacklist (the title blacklist rule also applies to draft space). I would suggest writing a draft there and then one of us will consider whether to move it to mainspace. (It isn't technically practical for us to permit you to create the page directly in mainspace) * Pppery * it has begun... 06:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery thank you so much. I'll write my draft in that space and then we'll take it from there. MC-123 (talk) 07:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I just checked, and yes, this is because of a title blacklist. Would it be possible for the page to be removed from the blacklist? I'm just here to create the article, that's all. MC-123 (talk) 06:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    The INES Level 7 classification for Bhopal is incorrect. The INES scale only applies to nuclear and radiological events. Official sources like the IAEA confirm this. Please correct the mistake. Itsrihan (talk) 08:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.